You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The bmf_forms table has a column L-ratio which is supposed to hold the rational value (computed exactly) L(F,1)/Period(F). There are several issues:
A glitch in the template code logic means that when the stored value is 0 (which will be true whenever the analytic rank is positive), the value is not displayed at all, instead of showing 0.
The knowl on "L-ratio" is mf.bianchi.anr (analytic rank) which is wrong. There is no knowl for the L-ratio, and there should be.
Lewis Combes tells me that he thinks some of these ratios are wrong, so I need to check my code and then recompute them.
In view of this I propose to hide the L-ratio display right away, pending a fix of the data. Then, when the data is fixed (and Lewis and I agree) I can redisplay the values and put in a knowl.
By the way, it is hard to compare this ratio with the similar number for elliptic curves (of rank 0) as predicted by the BSD, since it is not isogeny-invariant and there is no way of singling out the "right" curve in the isogeny class which has a matching ratio. I wrote a paper about this long ago, which included examples where more than one curve had the right ratio.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The bmf_forms table has a column L-ratio which is supposed to hold the rational value (computed exactly) L(F,1)/Period(F). There are several issues:
In view of this I propose to hide the L-ratio display right away, pending a fix of the data. Then, when the data is fixed (and Lewis and I agree) I can redisplay the values and put in a knowl.
By the way, it is hard to compare this ratio with the similar number for elliptic curves (of rank 0) as predicted by the BSD, since it is not isogeny-invariant and there is no way of singling out the "right" curve in the isogeny class which has a matching ratio. I wrote a paper about this long ago, which included examples where more than one curve had the right ratio.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: