Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[devops] Allow URLs in USE_PREVIEW_URL Vercel Environment Variable #2147

Open
2 tasks
0xemc opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

[devops] Allow URLs in USE_PREVIEW_URL Vercel Environment Variable #2147

0xemc opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
carbonmark dev Work related to engineering devops

Comments

@0xemc
Copy link
Collaborator

0xemc commented Jan 18, 2024

What:

Modify the Vercel environment variable USE_PREVIEW_URL to accept URLs.

Why:

Currently, the USE_PREVIEW_URL environment variable may not support URL inputs. Allowing URLs would enhance flexibility and utility, especially for testing different environments or configurations.

How:

Implement changes in the configuration to ensure USE_PREVIEW_URL can accept and correctly handle URL inputs. Test the changes to ensure they work as intended.

Expected Outcome:

  • USE_PREVIEW_URL accepts URLs without issues.
  • Successful testing and verification of the new functionality.

Testing Criteria:

  1. Test with various URL inputs to ensure correct functionality.
  2. Validate that the changes do not affect other functionalities or environment variables.
@0xemc 0xemc self-assigned this Jan 18, 2024
@jabby09 jabby09 changed the title Allow URLs in USE_PREVIEW_URL Vercel Environment Variable [devops] Allow URLs in USE_PREVIEW_URL Vercel Environment Variable Jan 18, 2024
@jabby09 jabby09 added the devops label Jan 18, 2024
@0xemc 0xemc added the dev Work related to engineering label Jan 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
carbonmark dev Work related to engineering devops
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants