We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is seems like bounded variables are not properly handled in SPARQL queries and often lead to wrong answers. Using blank nodes fixes the problem.
An example to reproduce the issue is the following:
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX ub: <http://www.lehigh.edu/~zhp2/2004/0401/univ-bench.owl#> SELECT ?X WHERE { ?Y ub:member ?X . ?Y rdf:type ub:ResearchGroup . ?X ub:advisor ?Z . ?Z rdf:type ub:AssociateProfessor . <http://www.Department0.University0.edu> ub:member ?Z }
Changing ?Y, ?Z to _:Y, _:Z respectively solves the issue.
?Y
?Z
_:Y
_:Z
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Is seems like bounded variables are not properly handled in SPARQL queries and often lead to wrong answers. Using blank nodes fixes the problem.
An example to reproduce the issue is the following:
Changing
?Y
,?Z
to_:Y
,_:Z
respectively solves the issue.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: