You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
Should there be an explicit Polygon type? Right now the code uses AbstractArray{Point} and Vector{Point} (in only one place each) to describe a Polygon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, that would be appreciated! We had some discussions about this, but never came to a conclusion, since people seem to have very different needs for polygons. I was thinking to make Vector{Vector{Point}} our first polygon type for now, since that's what e.g. https://github.com/JuliaGeometry/EarCut.jl expects right now, and I wish to integrate that better into the geometry infrastructure! But feel free to go ahead with any polygon type you want! We are pretty undecided on the exact definition, so it's a bit first come, first serve kind of situation ;)
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Should there be an explicit Polygon type? Right now the code uses
AbstractArray{Point}
andVector{Point}
(in only one place each) to describe a Polygon.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: