You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, when viewing a working group within Pioneer, there is no actual designation of a "job title". Although this is not a significant priority right now, I feel that Pioneer should be able to communicate to visitors what the general structure of a working group is--this can communicate to investors and others the organized nature of the DAO and project in general, whereas the current flat structure with a lack of titles does not achieve this.
Even within the DAO's own users it is sometimes tedious to figure out what specific workers do.
You can technically figure out what a "job title" is by clicking through a few layers and figure out what application a worker applied for but this is insufficient.
Solution
Have a form that uses a metaprotocol where the lead can designate the "job title" of a worker--although it is technically possible to derive a worker's "job title" from the opening that they applied for, the "job title" will likely change slightly over time for long term workers.
Show the "job title" next to the worker on the WG pages.
Example
This is from a recent Content Curator WG's report, and you can see how having "job titles" gives a lot more structure to things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Past work
Problem
Solution
Example
This is from a recent Content Curator WG's report, and you can see how having "job titles" gives a lot more structure to things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: