Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance Configuration Management and Code Generation for Multi-Database Support #283

Open
10 tasks
fasteddys opened this issue Dec 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
10 tasks

Comments

@fasteddys
Copy link

Hello this is a very nice utility, and solves a nice problem but its a little short, may share some feedback, around Configuration Management and Code Generation for Multi-Database Support, because you only target sql server, but if we do this with JSON EF core can read and target MongoDb as well.

Descripton:
Please Condiser Introduce a new configuration format (e.g., JSON) to replace the existing XML files. This will simplify the management of entity metadata and relationships. Additionally, enhance the code generator to support multiple databases (e.g., SQL Server, MongoDB, Firebase) and create strongly typed Web API CRUD operations.

New Features:

  • JSON Configuration File: Introduce a single JSON file (e.g., metadata.json) to store entity metadata, including properties, data types, and relationships.
  • Multi-Database Support: Enhance the code generator to support multiple databases, including SQL Server, MongoDB, and Firebase.
  • Strongly Typed Web API CRUD: Generate strongly typed Web API CRUD operations for each entity, using the selected database provider.
  • Improved Code Regeneration: Implement a more robust code regeneration mechanism that handles conflicts with manual changes and provides options for merging or overwriting generated code.
  • Entity Relationship Management: Introduce a visual interface (e.g., graph or tree view) to manage entity relationships, making it easier to define and maintain complex relationships.
  • Database Provider Abstraction: Introduce an abstraction layer for database providers, allowing developers to easily switch between databases without modifying the generated code.

Benefits:

  • Simplified Configuration Management: A single JSON file simplifies the management of entity metadata and relationships.
  • Multi-Database Support: Developers can easily target different databases, reducing the effort required to support multiple platforms.
  • Improved Code Quality: Strongly typed Web API CRUD operations and improved code regeneration reduce the risk of errors and improve overall code quality.
  • Increased Productivity: The visual interface for entity relationship management and the abstraction layer for database providers reduce the time and effort required to develop and maintain CRUD operations.

By implementing these features, the JJMasterData solution will become more flexible, scalable, and easier to use, making it a more attractive choice for developers who need to generate CRUD operations for multiple databases.


Also som suggestions for optional features

Optioneal Features:

  1. ASP.NET Identity Integration: Provide an option to integrate ASP.NET Identity for authentication and authorization, allowing developers to easily manage user identities and roles.
  2. Relationship Management: Introduce a visual interface (e.g., graph or tree view) to manage entity relationships, making it easier to define and maintain complex relationships.
  3. Master-Detail Relationship Detection: Implement a feature to detect and prevent cyclic relationships, ensuring that master-detail relationships are properly defined and avoiding potential data inconsistencies.
  4. Reference Data Loading: Provide an option to load reference data for specific fields, allowing developers to populate dropdown lists, checkboxes, or other controls with relevant data.
  5. Lazy Loading: Introduce an option to enable lazy loading for related entities, reducing the amount of data transferred and improving performance.
  6. Caching: Provide an option to cache frequently accessed data, reducing the number of database queries and improving application performance.

Benefits:

  1. Simplified Authentication and Authorization: ASP.NET Identity integration simplifies the process of managing user identities and roles.
  2. Improved Relationship Management: The visual interface for relationship management makes it easier to define and maintain complex relationships, reducing the risk of errors and inconsistencies.
  3. Prevention of Cyclic Relationships: The master-detail relationship detection feature prevents cyclic relationships, ensuring data consistency and reducing the risk of errors.
  4. Improved Data Population: The reference data loading feature makes it easier to populate controls with relevant data, improving the user experience and reducing development time.
  5. Improved Performance: Lazy loading and caching options improve application performance by reducing the amount of data transferred and the number of database queries.

New Approach:

To implement these features, the new approach could involve the following steps:

  1. Entity Configuration: Define entities and their relationships using a JSON configuration file.
  2. Relationship Management: Use a visual interface to manage entity relationships, detecting and preventing cyclic relationships.
  3. Reference Data Loading: Define reference data for specific fields, loading data from a database or other data source.
  4. ASP.NET Identity Integration: Integrate ASP.NET Identity for authentication and authorization, using the configured entities and relationships.
  5. Code Generation: Generate strongly typed Web API CRUD operations, using the configured entities, relationships, and reference data.
  6. Lazy Loading and Caching: Implement lazy loading and caching options, improving application performance and reducing the amount of data transferred.

Example JSON Configuration File:

{
  "entities": [
    {
      "name": "Customer",
      "fields": [
        {
          "name": "Id",
          "type": "int"
        },
        {
          "name": "Name",
          "type": "string"
        },
        {
          "name": "Orders",
          "type": "collection",
          "reference": "Order"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Order",
      "fields": [
        {
          "name": "Id",
          "type": "int"
        },
        {
          "name": "CustomerId",
          "type": "int",
          "reference": "Customer"
        },
        {
          "name": "OrderDate",
          "type": "datetime"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "relationships": [
    {
      "type": "master-detail",
      "parent": "Customer",
      "child": "Order"
    }
  ],
  "referenceData": [
    {
      "field": "Customer.Country",
      "data": [
        {
          "value": "USA",
          "text": "United States"
        },
        {
          "value": "Canada",
          "text": "Canada"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

This example configuration file defines two entities, Customer and Order, with their respective fields and relationships. The referenceData section defines reference data for the Customer.Country field.

@gumbarros
Copy link
Member

Hello @fasteddys! Did you use ChatGPT to generate this issue 😄?

  • FormElement metadata is already stored at JSON.
  • Multidatabase support is planned, feel free to create a PR, we don't have any customers that don't use SQL Server, but when needed, we will develop.
  • Code generation is already supported via SQL and C# at the element page
  • Caching of the FormElement already happen, but a PR for caching of the data, is welcome
  • Relationships are already supported, but I liked the idea of a graph or tree view
  • Identity is supported, but using JJInfinity (https://lp.jjconsulting.com.br/). Contact [email protected]

Your request is very large and I will check with more time next week with @LucioPelinson. Feel free to reduce the text size based on your needs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants