Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cos2cos missing #141

Open
BShadeWork opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

cos2cos missing #141

BShadeWork opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@BShadeWork
Copy link
Member

Cos2cos example has been removed but still in readme.
Can I have this example back in the latest.

@qu1queee
Copy link
Member

would this work #7 ?

@BShadeWork
Copy link
Member Author

Yes I looked but concerned there are some changes that have gone in others in main, the master is 3 years old now and why it was removed from main, so given the readme link fails for the main latest wanted to see if the example could go back in main (or if not remove from readme?). Can give "master" a go though.

@qu1queee
Copy link
Member

@reggeenr can you take a look please ^^

@reggeenr
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @BShadeWork , first of all I am sorry that we broke you.

We have tidied up to slim down a little.

Can you please share how you use the sample? E.g. as-is to fulfil a certain backup use case

@BShadeWork
Copy link
Member Author

Not broken, just wanting to go forward with a good base. Sure I can work it out, just trying my make my life easier!
The use case is as the title, so moving specific matching objects from bucket to bucket both within a cos, and cos to cos. Its for enabling processing on the object and moving them between each "processor", where each has a specific cos bucket. Its important they are separated. Just after a simple way to move between the buckets/cos based on object name criteria and cos2cos looked idea base for that.

@reggeenr
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @BShadeWork , thanks for sharing details. I will see what I can do to bring back the cos2cos example. However, it will most likely take a few days.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants