From 76b91e5df4ccac3ea8dc40885dcef2e56e74e1e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Deutsch Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:58:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] do we want to add "neutral"? (#336) * do we want to add "neutral"? This has been proposed by the reviewer of the mzSpecLib manuscript. Do we want to make this change? What implications are there for downstream tools and files? * Update psi-ms.obo --------- Co-authored-by: Joshua Klein --- psi-ms.obo | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/psi-ms.obo b/psi-ms.obo index 84a5d2d..792d20b 100644 --- a/psi-ms.obo +++ b/psi-ms.obo @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ format-version: 1.2 -data-version: 4.1.179 -date: 18:08:2024 07:15 -saved-by: Chris Bielow +data-version: 4.1.180 +date: 04:10:2024 07:15 +saved-by: Joshua Klein auto-generated-by: OBO-Edit 2.3.1 default-namespace: MS namespace-id-rule: * MS:$sequence(7,0,9999999)$ @@ -7312,11 +7312,12 @@ is_a: MS:1001085 ! protein-level identification attribute [Term] id: MS:1001117 -name: theoretical mass +name: theoretical neutral mass def: "The theoretical neutral mass of the molecule (e.g. the peptide sequence and its modifications) not including its charge carrier." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001105 ! peptide sequence-level identification attribute relationship: has_units UO:0000221 ! dalton relationship: has_value_type xsd:double ! The allowed value-type for this CV term +synonym: "theoretical mass" EXACT [] [Term] id: MS:1001118