Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support bicycle=destination for bike profiles #1782

Closed
1 task done
waldyrious opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task done

Support bicycle=destination for bike profiles #1782

waldyrious opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@waldyrious
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Feature/Enhancement Proposal

The bike routing should allow routing through paths marked with "bicycle=destination". For example, this route should follow this sequence of ways: 1262007841, 1262007844, 1262007834, 1262007838, 1262007843; but instead it goes around the square:

image

Additional context

No response

Possible Implementation

No response

Forum Topic Link

No response

@aoles
Copy link
Member

aoles commented May 10, 2024

Hi @waldyrious,

First of all thank you for raising the issue and for opening a corresponding PR with a fix.

While I understand your concerns, I don't believe this is actually a valid issue. This is so because routing on OSM ways tagged with bicycle=destination is not disabled in general. However, transit traffic on ways tagged with access destination is forbidden and it is allowed to use the way only to reach a destination that can not be reached otherwise, see OSM wiki. This is also the reason why the way is not used in your example. The described behaviour becomes evident once you choose a via point on the way in question.

Cheers,
Andrzej

@aoles aoles closed this as completed May 10, 2024
@waldyrious
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, I see! Thanks for the explanation. I suppose the path is mistagged, then, as it is not forbidden to bike there. I'll fix the map. Cheers!

@aoles
Copy link
Member

aoles commented May 10, 2024

Thanks! Not sure either where the tagging comes from. I had a quick look via StreetView on the neighborhood in question but couldn't spot any signs limiting access to the square. As you said, it seems to be perfectly fine to take the shortcut.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Status: Awaiting release
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants