-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ontologies for organization description #24
Comments
Hello Benoît, I guess it depends on what properties you'd like to describe: the structure of the organization itself ? For organizations, there is :
(often a mix of FOAF / ORG will do) If it's about roles and provenance, then of course the PROV ontologies are an excellent choice Best regards Bart |
Bart Thank you for answer. Basically we want to provide these informations:
|
Sounds like a good match for W3C ORG and W3C ROV. They allow for fine-grained description of organizations, and relations like "subOrganizationOf", "memberOf":
The ORG specification provides some nice examples, e.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/#example-1 Since org:Organization is a subclass of foaf:Agent, and since RDF is very flexible, FOAF properties can be used for homepage, mailbox, logo... |
Dear Bart
I hope you are all right. I have a question concerning the best way of describing brussels regions' public organization in our web applications (like openbudgets or datastore). Would you recommand the use of Prov DM or the use of the FOAF ontology?
Thank you for your answer!
Regards and I wish you all the best for christmas
Regards
Benoît
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: