You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I run the experiment of Nbody. However, with the default hyper-parameters and those recommended in README file, I got a different Test pos_mse from your paper. My result is around 0.03, and your result shown in paper is 0.0076. The difference of Test vel_mse also exists.
I am wondering if you can provide your hyper-parameter setting of Nbody experiment so that I can try to reproduce your result.
Thanks,
Yunmeng
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Great to hear that you are interested in our work! :)
My first thought is that you may have created the simulation with 20 particles (which I think is the default setting), but in the paper we used 5. Obviously, a system with 20 particles is more complex and will lead to larger errors.
Secondly, keep in mind that this is not the exact code from the paper but a reimplementation (IP reasons), both for the simulation and for the model. Hence, the results won't be exactly the same. However, if I do remember correctly, when we ran this code here with 5 particles, we got slightly better results than in the paper.
Hi Fabian,
I run the experiment of Nbody. However, with the default hyper-parameters and those recommended in README file, I got a different
Test pos_mse
from your paper. My result is around 0.03, and your result shown in paper is 0.0076. The difference ofTest vel_mse
also exists.I am wondering if you can provide your hyper-parameter setting of Nbody experiment so that I can try to reproduce your result.
Thanks,
Yunmeng
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: