Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Follow-up ticket for more efficient guideline statistics #4442

Closed
bruntib opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 0 comments
Closed

Follow-up ticket for more efficient guideline statistics #4442

bruntib opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@bruntib
Copy link
Contributor

bruntib commented Jan 28, 2025

#4433 introduces an API which assumes that checker-severity mapping is known by the client. However, the implementation queries severity for each checker separately. This could be improved by querying the list of severity values for all checkers in one query.
@bruntib bruntib closed this as completed Jan 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@bruntib