Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

systematise what to do with PV prefixes #74

Open
d-perl opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

systematise what to do with PV prefixes #74

d-perl opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@d-perl
Copy link
Contributor

d-perl commented May 26, 2023

@d-perl
Copy link
Contributor Author

d-perl commented May 31, 2023

Devices which take more than one prefix for different components should accept these as additional kwargs so that the root PV prefix should always be in the beamline files, for improved reusability of devices. E.g. use of -EA- and -MO- differs between beamlines and this should not prevent device reuse.

@stan-dot stan-dot added the question Further information is requested label Sep 25, 2024
@stan-dot
Copy link
Contributor

applicable to the pressure cell - the one with separate ADC prefixes.

Might be of interest to: @barnettwilliam

@stan-dot stan-dot added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants