You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[x] bug report => search existing issues for a similar problems/requests
[ ] feature request
[ ] support request => Please do not submit support request here, instead see: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/support/intact
Current behaviour
For some of the complexes in the downloaded ComplexTab file, the molecules contained in the complex are listed individually with stoichiometry (1), although there are more than one of that type of molecule. For example, the following complex consists of one subcomplex and 4 homodimers, which are listed individually.
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behaviour?
This is just a minor bug, but it makes it more difficult to see the actual stoichiometry of the complex, especially in case of the long PRO IDs. Also, the current behaviour is an inconsistency within the ComplexTab file as well as between the file and the browser representation.
Rebecca, I just had time to check: this is a known issue (@noedelta -> Jira CP-207) and is on our to-do-list.
For the time being, I'm afraid, you will need to collapse the stoichiometry at your end.
The stoichiometry is expanded by default for complex that have participants with specific binding features. For all other complexes the stoichiometry is collapsed by default anyway.
Please do not hesitate to send us more feedback or suggestions.
I'm submitting a ... (check one with "x")
Current behaviour
For some of the complexes in the downloaded ComplexTab file, the molecules contained in the complex are listed individually with stoichiometry (1), although there are more than one of that type of molecule. For example, the following complex consists of one subcomplex and 4 homodimers, which are listed individually.
In the browser view, these complex participants are summarized correctly though (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/complexportal/complex/CPX-1920).
Expected behaviour
ComplexTab should list complex participants with the correct stoichiometry, as also shown on the web page:
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behaviour?
This is just a minor bug, but it makes it more difficult to see the actual stoichiometry of the complex, especially in case of the long PRO IDs. Also, the current behaviour is an inconsistency within the ComplexTab file as well as between the file and the browser representation.
Please tell us about your environment:
Ubuntu 16.04 with Firefox
Just a few guidelines for how to write effective and good GitHub issues: HOW WE WRITE GITHUB ISSUES
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: