Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Indicate what the skill ratings correspond to #16

Open
NixFrog opened this issue Sep 30, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Indicate what the skill ratings correspond to #16

NixFrog opened this issue Sep 30, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@NixFrog
Copy link
Member

NixFrog commented Sep 30, 2016

When a user hovers over a star, it indicates to him what this level corresponds to.
I propose the following scale (for language mastery, can be translated for other skills):

  1. Basic knowledge, can handle / has written a few hundred of lines
  2. Average level ( == a bit more than A at ESIEE), knows all of the core language features. Can handle several thousand lines.
  3. Good level ( == did an internship or worked hard on it), knows most features, can use several big libraries commonly used. Can handle / has written projects of up to 100k lines.
  4. Very good level (max at ESIEE I think), can solve very complex problems, knows all features, can handle several hundred thousand lines of code. Contributes to open source projects may have contributed to major ones
  5. Expert, extremely high level, contributes to huge projects, knows basically everything.

The scale is of course open to debate. But I think this feature is important.

@Nepta
Copy link
Member

Nepta commented Sep 30, 2016

maybe using, like in scrum, prime Fibonacci number (2, 3, 5, 13, 89 ...) as scale so it's easier to make the difference between good and very good ?

@Nepta
Copy link
Member

Nepta commented Sep 30, 2016

i think the highest lvl should be "recognized by his peers" ?

@pacien
Copy link

pacien commented Oct 4, 2016

Use complex numbers!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants