You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since N2V is self-supervised, it is not clear to many users how to properly validate the results. In the docs, we highlight the importance to examine the following:
autocorrelation to inspect structured noise in the data
residuals after training to see whether any spatial information has been removed, spatial information being not 0-mean as opposed to Poisson or readout noise.
Currently, the autocorrelation is not compatible with stacks (#298), and there is no convenience function to compute the residuals or examine their statistics.
Finally, residuals could be logged during training (idea raised by @conradkun).
Explore window-averaging the residuals to explore areas with non-0-mean statistics, validate on poorly trained models and models with good performances on the benchmarks.
Linked issues
#294: log prediction (potentially residuals) during training #298: extend autocorrelation function to stacks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem
Since N2V is self-supervised, it is not clear to many users how to properly validate the results. In the docs, we highlight the importance to examine the following:
0-mean
as opposed to Poisson or readout noise.Currently, the autocorrelation is not compatible with stacks (#298), and there is no convenience function to compute the residuals or examine their statistics.
Finally, residuals could be logged during training (idea raised by @conradkun).
Potential solution
Linked issues
#294: log prediction (potentially residuals) during training
#298: extend autocorrelation function to stacks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: