Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explore the degeneracy of Amplitude ratio, f_spot, T_spot, and T_ambient #27

Open
gully opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@gully
Copy link
Member

gully commented Jul 19, 2022

All we measure for a given star is an amplitude ratio between TESS and K2. There is a subtle "self dilution effect" that we allude to in the proposal. Most practitioners have not contemplated this effect, so there is not a great reference for it. This paper can help you think about the degeneracies though. Here is my attempt. Imagine three stars:

image

The simple spot blocks some amount of bright yellow light compared to the spot-free scenario, let's say 2% of the area with an 0.5 contrast, so 1% of the flux is lost in the simple spot case compared to the spot-free case.

But now consider the star with a major polar cap of spots that is seen at all rotational phases. The simple spot tends to block the brighter-on-average flux. So that same 2% for the disk area is blocking say 2.8% of the yellow stuff.

So mapping between amplitude of modulation ratio, f_spot, T_spot, and T_ambient is subtle and partially degenerate.

There is a way to quantify degeneracy: Simply brute-force compute a grid cross all permutations of f_spot and T_spot that are consistent with:

  1. The TESS-to-K2 amplitude ratio
  2. The T_eff reported in the catalog we are using (set T_eff = T_ambient for simplicity)

For each star we will now have a heatmap of $f_{spot}$ and $T_{spot}$. It is unweildy to work with these heat maps for many stars! So we have to combine them in some way. That will be another task. For now let's get familiar with this idea of degeneracy, and think about how we may scale out this analysis.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant