Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vnet IP Configuration - is that right? #7

Open
shaunryan opened this issue Feb 16, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Vnet IP Configuration - is that right? #7

shaunryan opened this issue Feb 16, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@shaunryan
Copy link

shaunryan commented Feb 16, 2020

The vnet recommendation doesn't quite make sense to me.
It seems to be telling me that to get the max number host I should use a /16 vnet address. So for example:

10.0.0.0/16 - this will give the 255*255 - 2 assignable host / = aprox 16000 cluster hosts.
However I don't understand the table. Next it seems to be telling me that I should subnet the /16 into /18 for the public and private sub net. If I do that then the table doesn't make sense.

The public hosts will be slashed - so how can I achieve 16000 cluster host (64000 host IP's) on /18 subnet?
So based on the info the document following that it indicates that I need to create 2 subnets in the vnet range with a 2 borrowed subnet bits. It says the private and the public borrowed bits have to be the same:

private: 10.0.0.0/18 -> That's not 64000 host ip's? This doesn't make any sense to me

Can you give an example for public and private subnet values that achieve the maximum available clusters?

The best you can achieve is aprox 4000 cluster host (/4) but that wastes an awful lot IP's in the private range.

@shaunryan
Copy link
Author

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
@shaunryan and others