Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can migrate iris 1.6.10 or higher version for mc 1.18.2? #754

Open
Stasert39 opened this issue Jan 18, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Can migrate iris 1.6.10 or higher version for mc 1.18.2? #754

Stasert39 opened this issue Jan 18, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Stasert39
Copy link

Stasert39 commented Jan 18, 2025

What happened?

MC version 1.18 can only be used with Oculus version 1.6.4, but this version has problems with some shaders.Such as 'iterationT'.Is it possible to migrate iris1.6.10 or higher version for mc 1.18.2?

Screenshots

Image
Image
As shown in the picture, when you hold a block in your hand, the shadow part will become very dark.

Relevant log output

Minecraft Version

1.18.2

Oculus Version

mc1.18.2-1.6.4

Rubidium / Embeddium Version

embeddium-0.3.10+mc1.18.2

Operating System

win11

What is your GPU?

3070laptop

Java Version

java17

Additional context

No response

@Stasert39 Stasert39 added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 18, 2025
@Stasert39 Stasert39 reopened this Jan 18, 2025
@Stasert39 Stasert39 changed the title Can a higher version of Oculus be compatible with a lower version of mc,such as 1.18 and 1.19? Can migrate iris1.6.10 or higher version for mc 1.18.2? Jan 18, 2025
@Stasert39 Stasert39 changed the title Can migrate iris1.6.10 or higher version for mc 1.18.2? Can migrate iris 1.6.10 or higher version for mc 1.18.2? Jan 18, 2025
@Stasert39
Copy link
Author

Stasert39 commented Jan 18, 2025

After testing, iris1.6.6 has same problem but iris1.6.10 fixed it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant