workaround for addDevice dbus #433
Replies: 1 comment
-
I have been working on this issue but it's of limited value. Dbus is not designed to transmit large amounts of data (like the original Signal message attachments), so at this point only metadata is sent other than for the text of the message itself. (This formally limits the message to 128Mb, the maximum size of a Dbus command.) So the Dbus daemon is indeed designed just for "automatisation etc." See my sample implementation of a Signal-to-email program (https://github.com/johnfreed/signalmail). It's theoretically possible on the primary machine to run a renamed signal-cli (signal-secondary?) that would supervise only secondary devices out of a different data directory (other than $HOME/.local/share/signal-cli) and perhaps others have already done so. I haven't tried to work on that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
it is a pitty we can't use
signal-cli --dbus addDevice --uri
it just says.
addDevice is not yet implemented via dbus
is there a workaround for that?
otherwise,
link
would be as helpfull as well, cause then we could use all other features of signal-cli and leave the dbus daemon for automatisation etc.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions