Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question About BFB Positive and Cyclic Class Amplicons in AmpliconClassifier #22

Open
DinDenkk opened this issue Nov 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@DinDenkk
Copy link

Hi,

Thank you for developing AmpliconClassifier—it has been an invaluable resource for my research. I have a question regarding the interpretation of results in a specific case.

After running AmpliconClassifier, I observed an amplicon that was classified as BFB positive and had an decomposition class of cyclic. I am curious whether such an amplicon can be interpreted as ecDNA based on this classification alone.

I appreciate your clarification or any guidance on this matter and look forward to your insights.

Best regards,

@jluebeck jluebeck added the FAQ label Nov 20, 2024
@jluebeck
Copy link
Member

Hi, thanks for this great question.

Oftentimes we see that AA decomposes BFB structures into cyclic genome paths. This does not change the fact that the amplification is a BFB, rather it indicates that from a bioinformatic perspective the genome reconstructions ended up being genome cycles. This of course also happens naturally with ecDNA, but for BFBs the genome cycles happen for a completely different reason. BFBs that get a bioinformatically cyclic decomposition seem to do so when there are lots of high copy-number inverted duplications and AA will extract a path that starts and ends at the same location, appearing like a genome cycle. Those cases (BFB-positive and decomposition class Cyclic) do not imply ecDNA.

BFB-negative and decomposition class Cyclic would on the other hand imply ecDNA.

Thanks,
Jens

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants