Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Utilize ChatGPT Plus #6002

Open
avi12 opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

[Feature]: Utilize ChatGPT Plus #6002

avi12 opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@avi12
Copy link

avi12 commented Jan 3, 2025

What problem or use case are you trying to solve?

Not paying a hefty amount of money to OpenAI as I already have a ChatGPT subscription

Describe the UX of the solution you'd like
Possibly a browser extension that can pump OH prompts and use the ChatGPT response to feed back to the OH agent

Do you have thoughts on the technical implementation?
I have a decent experience with browser extensions, I could probably assist in coding one
My framework of choice is https://gitHub.com/wxt-dev/wxt
One gotcha to keep in mind is that the text area has a limit to the number of characters, hence, OH needs to work around it, for example splitting the giant prompt into multiple small ones

Describe alternatives you've considered
The only alternatives are currently relying on API requests to OpenAI/Anthropic/LM Studio

@avi12 avi12 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 3, 2025
@amirshawn
Copy link

This is just an assumption but if I had to guess that would be breaking the user agreement with OpenAI. Unless you somehow throttled Open Hands to a crawl, it would most likey be caught pretty easily.

@avi12
Copy link
Author

avi12 commented Jan 3, 2025

Does Anthropic have a similar TOS limitation?

@avi12
Copy link
Author

avi12 commented Jan 3, 2025

On the OpenAI part, we're out of luck
Same for Anthropic 😬

@mamoodi
Copy link
Collaborator

mamoodi commented Jan 3, 2025

So should we close this?

@avi12
Copy link
Author

avi12 commented Jan 3, 2025

I mean, unless you have an idea for a workaround

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants