We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We had created a bug in a DAC, without noticing, which might be possible for Acuminator to detect upfront.
This was how we wrongly mixed syntax in DAC field Attribute (and it is not detected by Visual Studio, as this is happening inside typeof():
[PXParent(typeof(Select<InventoryItem, Where<InventoryItem.inventoryID .IsEqual<PTINItemCommodityCode.inventoryID.FromCurrent>>>))]
This is correct for FBQL:
[PXParent(typeof(SelectFrom<InventoryItem>.Where<InventoryItem.inventoryID .IsEqual<PTINItemCommodityCode.inventoryID.FromCurrent>>))]
Might be a good place for Acuminator to kick in and safe us from doing invalid BQL or FBQL. Thank you for your great work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the proposal. We will add a suggestion to check that BQL and FBQL are not mixed to the list of new features considered for Acuminator
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
We had created a bug in a DAC, without noticing, which might be possible for Acuminator to detect upfront.
This was how we wrongly mixed syntax in DAC field Attribute (and it is not detected by Visual Studio, as this is happening inside typeof():
This is correct for FBQL:
Might be a good place for Acuminator to kick in and safe us from doing invalid BQL or FBQL.
Thank you for your great work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: