You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 1, 2021. It is now read-only.
I know that you said slippage won't be affected by the min-gain and max-loss percentages. But sometimes unfortunately when those percentages are really tight, the slippage can still cause unprofitable trades. I know this can be fixed by accounting for this in the slippage as well as the min-gain and max-loss settings, but I was just wondering if it would be possible for you to make setting a specific slippage % be optional, but relying more on whether we still are within the min-gain and max-loss settings.
Basically, if a swap is attempted, before executing we make sure that the slippage hasn't exceeded the min-gain or max-loss, and using those as whether or not the swap gets cancelled or completed.
Thank you so much
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I know that you said slippage won't be affected by the min-gain and max-loss percentages. But sometimes unfortunately when those percentages are really tight, the slippage can still cause unprofitable trades. I know this can be fixed by accounting for this in the slippage as well as the min-gain and max-loss settings, but I was just wondering if it would be possible for you to make setting a specific slippage % be optional, but relying more on whether we still are within the min-gain and max-loss settings.
Basically, if a swap is attempted, before executing we make sure that the slippage hasn't exceeded the min-gain or max-loss, and using those as whether or not the swap gets cancelled or completed.
Thank you so much
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: