-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Meabo, deepbench binary for linux #1270
Comments
Hi, Yes you should be able to compile the binaries from the respective projects [1] and [2] and place the resultant binary files in your dependencies directory [3] for WA to discover without any code changes. For the deepbench workload we do have some reference binaries available in our assets repository [4] that can be downloaded, or WA can be configured to try and retrieve these files automatically by setting the For the meabo workload, this binary would need to be compiled for your target device and placed in Please let me know if you have any further questions. [1] https://github.com/baidu-research/DeepBench?tab=readme-ov-file#arm-benchmarks |
Hi Marc Bonnici, Thanks for the detailed response. For the deepbench, I had copied the binaries to the dependencies directory. When I execute the workload getting error like below.
Similar error was observed for dhrystone workload as well. If I comment this line in the Any idea/suggestions for this would be appreciated. |
It looks like something is going wrong when it is attempting to clean up ay previous invocations of the workload executable. Would you be able to provide a Also do you know which versions of WA / devlib you are using / are you using the last release or are you using the latest master branch on github? |
We are running above two workloads for a linux target. And we are getting binary not found error for these two workloads. Also when I checked source code of WA, I didn't find any binary in wa/workloads/deepbench or wa/workloads/meabo
Need help in this case how to execute these workloads? Should we add binary ourselves? Will that be enough or any further changes in code is needed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: