Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Compare with regular prediction: PLINK assoc_qt and betas #46

Open
richelbilderbeek opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Compare with regular prediction: PLINK assoc_qt and betas #46

richelbilderbeek opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Contributor

richelbilderbeek commented May 19, 2022 •
edited
Loading

See #42 that M1 and p1 give the best prediction

> knitr::kable(t |> dplyr::filter(model_id == "M1" & pheno_model_id == "p1"))
model_id pheno_model_id window_kb genotype_concordance nmse
M1 p1 1 0.4773399 1.0988598
M1 p1 10 0.2206714 0.9964508
M1 p1 100 0.1404004 1.6963628
M1 p1 1000 0.0453623 1.0317558

However, how well does a simple PLINK run fare?
@richelbilderbeek richelbilderbeek changed the title Compare with regular prediction Compare with regular prediction: PLINK assoc_qt and betas May 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@richelbilderbeek