You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's good to remember that when dbus craps out all the software that depends on it stops working.
I imagine that display manager ought to work regardless of whether dbus feels like working or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
zetok
changed the title
[Feature request] don't support dbus, or at least make support for it to an opt-in compile-time option
[Feature request] don't support dbus, or at least make support for it an opt-in compile-time option
May 30, 2017
Yeah I initially started adding dbus as I thought it would be required in "modern dms"(tm) but I no longer think that that is the case. The dbus crate is currently not used and could probably be removed.
The idea of an opt-in compile-time option sounds good, if I end up providing a dbus interface I will probably enable it through a cargo feature.
I will keep this open as long as dbus is still around in the codebase and not properly behind a feature.
Among things.
It's good to remember that when dbus craps out all the software that depends on it stops working.
I imagine that display manager ought to work regardless of whether dbus feels like working or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: